HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:01:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>It is clear that the current PWR still puts too much weight on a 
>relatively small portion of games leading to?not only the inflation 
>of mid-level WCHA teams, but the?top?ranking of Miami and Michigan.?


>I could also gripe about the lack of inter-conference road games for 
>the WCHA, but that is a constant irritant of this system to the 
>eastern teams that will not change, so let's address the things we 
>can improve.

well..  we could gripe about that..   but Many "experts" say that 
Krach should be used.  if Krach is used, Wisconsin is in as a #12 
team. Minnesota State is in as an #11 team.  And, I could be wrong, 
but it looks like even Minnesota-Duluth is in as a #13 team.  That 
would give 8 teams for the WCHA.

How many would be complaining that?  8 of 16 teams from the WCHA?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2