HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Sweeney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pamela Sweeney <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:14:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Another point is that the major conferences can usually* assume that any team good enough to win the regular-season title will, in the process of doing so, have compiled a record good enough to qualify them for an at-large bid, so they can best maximize their conference's participation by giving their autobid to the tourney champ.

*CC in the 12-team days (1994, I think) is an example of when this didn't happen.  The paucity of examples, however supports the point that, on average, a conference's best strategy is to give the bid to the tournament champ.

-Pam

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Dr. Bob Hamilton" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Mar 18, 2007 3:07 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Starting the Bitching Early
>
>Thanks for the information.  Seems you are saying that the Ivy League really
>has no choice since it does not have a tournament.  And, if a conference has
>only one autobid and also has a tournament that it would be beneficial from
>a monetary standpoint to give the tournament more value, so the choice is
>not very free. Guess we know the results by now.  Bob Hamilton

ATOM RSS1 RSS2