HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mike patten <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I thought CC dominated the game but made of ton of mistakes that let the
limited Colgate chances turn into goals.. much like the BC game where they
made even more bad mistakes and gave mercyhurst several chances to tie or
win without almost no puck control all game..

>Hello All,
>
>I love the smell of flaming sarcasm in the morning (to play on the words
>of a famous actor in a famous film) ... can even smell the odor way out
>here :-)
>
>Anyone want to comment on the Colgate-CC game? Several folks who saw it
>claim Colgate played very well, but I see a huge shot differential (I
>know that isnt always a good indicator). And the goalie Silverthorn, how
>did he let in 6 goals?
>
>So is the top team in the WCHA barely good enough to beat the #3 or #4
>team in the ECACHL?  :-)
>
>Let the games continue,.
>
>Tony Buffa
>RPI '64  Go Red!
>=======
>
>Bill Fenwick wrote:
>
>>Well, I certainly hope the coaches of the other three teams in the West
>>regional are paying close attention to these scouting reports on Cornell.
>>Not to worry, guys, just prepare as if you were playing the ninth-place
>>WCHA team and you'll be all set.  Well, to be on the safe side, better prep
>>for the eighth-place team...
>>
>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2