that makes a lot of sense.  plus, it adds a lot to the game if they don't
have notes from previous meetings during the season.  nobody knows
what to expect from either.
 
srq
 
>
> In response to the last few letter about possibly adding a new conference
> or cutting back on conference games, I have a few thoughts. I think it is
> a good idea that there should be some more non-conference match-ups. On
> the other hand, it seems like one of the reasons we look forward to the
> post-season is so we can see our favorite teams pitted against teams from
> other divisions.  That is kind of the magic of the NC$$ tourney. If we
> saw Mich and Maine play in the regular season, that would kind of take
> away the "one-shot" excitement we get if they were to meet in the
> semi-finals or even the championship.  It gets kind of old when the NFL
> teams play each other and then come Superbowl time, they have stats on
> the two teams playing eachother during the season. It is nice to see two
> teams who have not faced off the whole season take on each other in a big
> game. Scouts can pick up some keys from different teams, but just seeing
> your team and another team who dont' know too much about eachother go at
> it seems to add a certain degree of excitement. Well, that is all, thanks
> for the time.
>
>
>                                    aaron.
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
 
 
--
scott quakkelaar
[log in to unmask]
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.