In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
wrote:
 
 
> What we may have here is not that the ECAC is so much more balanced, but
> that Princeton is an odd case.  I'll be more convinced if some other team
> makes it to the ECAC championship game from the #7 seed or lower.  Michigan
> Tech made it to the WCHA final as the #10 seed one year, but that had a lot
> more to do with Jamie Ram playing completely off his nut rather than any
> sort of team effort.
 
RPI won the 1995 championship as the number 6 seed. The Engineers defeated
Princeton, the number 7 seed, in the final. Princeton had defeated the
number 1 seed (Clarkson) in the seminfinals, after eliminating the number
2 seed (Brown) in the quarterfinals. In 1992 RPI as the number 10 seed
made it to the ECAC championship game. Etc.
 
Luiz F. Valente
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.