Nathan Boyle made a nice post on the CCHA Olympians, but I
feel it was a partial disservice to UM and MSU.  I believe BGSU
probably has more Olympians than any school currently in the
CCHA, but UM and MSU surely have more than four each.  I'm
guessing that they've had four each since joining the CCHA, and
that is the discrepancy.
 
Rob Cornelius writes
>H'mmmmm. Is this true? Is our beloved D-1 hockey the #2 revenue producer?
>Compared to what? At which schools? This makes very little sense.
 
Makes sense to me.  I posted the numbers (to I-H-L) earlier this
season.  I wish I still had them handy.  I believe the angle hear is
that Division I hockey provides the second highest revenue NCAA
tourney among men's sports.  Not hard to believe.  Obviously, hoops
is number one...but the NCAA doesn't have a football tourney, so
someone else has to be in the top two.
 
 
John H ([log in to unmask])
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.