HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:34:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
> John Haeussler wrote in part:
>
> from ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PANEL
> (case 718) Someone wanted the season-of-competition
> rule to be waived for a player that appeared in three games
> and was then cut.  It was denied.  (Hence, the three games
> played will cost the player a full year of eligibility/competition.)
>
>
> Does anyone know if this would be Kyle Ferguson of Michigan Tech who is
> now sitting around waiting to be eligible to play at RPI?  If three was
> the number of games he played at MTU this year, then I would strongly
> suspect that it is he.  In any case, it was stated in The Hockey News
> that Ferguson would be able to play starting next January.  If he has
> only one year of eligibility left, would he use it up by playing the
> second half of the 95-96 season?  It would seem strange that RPI would
> want a player who only would play for them for about 15 games.  Of
> course, if he sat out all of 95-96 in addition to the remainder of this
> year, he would be eligible for the entire 96-97 season.
>
 
 
According to the current stats on the Huskie Hockey home page, Kyle Ferguson
did indeed play 3 games at the beginning of this season.  That he was the
player  in the above decision, I have no knowledge of.
 
Bob
> Ralph Baer
> RPI '68, '70, '74
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2