HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:27:31 -0600
Reply-To:
"John T. Whelan" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: PWR
From:
"John T. Whelan" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Moller Edward N <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (16 lines) 
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Moller Edward N wrote:

> For the purpose of computing individual comparisons, do these two teams now
> qualify as TUC's?  FWIW, Maine stands to gain something from this.

Yes.  At least this was the answer we got from the NCAA five years ago
when we asked them, and we've had no indication that it's changed.

See http://slack.net/~whelan/tbrw.cgi?1998/pairwise

                                          John Whelan, Cornell '91
                                                 [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.amurgsval.org/joe/

Enjoy the latest Hockey Geek tools at slack.net/hockey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2