HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: College Hockey/USA Olympic hockey team
From:
Bob Griebel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:34:49 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Bob Griebel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
Didn't some part of last week's history lesson mention the red line was
invented to give the old guys a chance to keep up with the young guys during
the war and to hold Rocket Richard to 50 goals?  Could it be that someone just
needs to point out the war is over?

bob


Greg Ambrose wrote:

> In Sunday's Boston Globe, NHL columnist Kevin Paul Dupont admitted that
> hockey without the red line was more exciting than the NHL brand of hockey.
> It is the first time I have seen one of these NHL lifers concede the
> obvious.  If only the dunderheads who run the North American game would
> follow suit.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2