HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Mar 1996 14:49:51 -0600
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Lee Urton <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Brian Morris wrote:
 
> But I don't need to bash the West for their policies, I
> think the tourney composition has already done that.
 
Well, I don't know about that. True, the WCHA will likely have only two
teams in the NCAA Tournament this year, but I don't think it was because
of the WCHA policy regarding so many conference games. I think it was
because Denver, almost considered a lock in January, finished their
season going 2-8-1. With a record like that, it hardly matters if you
play those games in or out of conference.
 
Last year, four WCHA teams made the tournament, and they still had the
same number of conference games. The year before that, two, and the year
before that, four.
 
Other than an intriguing pattern that seems to emerge, I see no
immediately obvious ill effects from the fact that the WCHA plays at
most four non-conference games, at least come tournament time.
 
                                -Lee-nerd
                                [log in to unmask]
 
 
"It is not written in the stars that I will always understand what is
going on - a truism that I often find damnably annoying."
                                -Robert Heinlein
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2