HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Dr Martin G. Keeney" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 1996 21:32:15 -0500
Comments:
Reply-To:
"Dr Martin G. Keeney" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
LSSU has the tiebreaker over all 3 (Mich MSU WMU).  The rest is
undetermined until later.  At the moment tiebreakers are WMU/Mich
and MSU/WMU and since Mich must beat MSU to get to 46, Mich/MSU
would result.  Next tie-breaker is h2h goals (same results).
Next tie-breaker is against #1 (still no decision), against #2, #3
and #4 (stalemate), against #5, Bowling Green.  BG has season
series over WMU, but both Mich and MSU must yet play BG with both
series even at this point, so no decision yet.  It is still messy
at this point of the analysis but Mich must beat BG to get to 46
amd MSU must tie BG to be at 46 so Mich gets #2, MSU #3 and WMU #4.
 
That is a 5-minute analysis which may or may not be correct.
 
You could refer the question to Bill Fenwick who has extensive
experience ferreting out ECAC@ standings - but he'll be too busy
doing the ECAC in time for their playoffs to be of much help
with the CCHA.   (;-)-
 
-glen-
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2