Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:32:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With the recent call for more postings, I've decided to let my fingers do
some walking. I think mics on the refs are ok as long as the refs don't
decide to make a show about it. I have noticed that refs some times take
extra efforts to talk to the players more, when it isn't necessary and it
turns me off. I firmly believe in the principle; if a referee is doing a
good job, you shouldn't notice them.
Another pet peeve of mine in officiating is when there is a scrum in the
corner and the play is going nowhere and the ref does not blow the
whistle. I would prefer to watch the strategy of a face-off, then a group
of players standing around in the corner accomplishing nothing. Blow the
whistle, REF! Just my 2 cents...
________________________________________________________________________
Thomas W. Coates email [log in to unmask]
Auxiliary Marketing phone (906) 635-2540
Lake Superior State Univ. fax (906) 635-2695
650 W. Easterday Ave
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
"If you think you can or can't, you're right" - Henry Ford
_______________________________________________________________________________
On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Kevin Coty wrote:
> Glenn Auerbach wrote:
>
> <stuff deleted>
>
>
> > Harold Schock (michigan) was
> > given a major for hitting from behind.
>
> <more stuff deleted>
>
> I was watching the game on Prime and they had a mic on the officials.
> While Piotrowski (sp?) was explaining the call to the captains I heard him
> say that a major and game misconduct for checking from behind was a rule
> change for this year. My question is, why is the penalty so severe? I
> realize that checking from behind is VERY dangerous and as a USA Hockey
> official, I very rarely let a checking-from -behind penalty go uncalled. I
> know that USA Hockey is trying to crack down on the checking from behind
> penalties. Could it be that the NC$$ is trying to do the same thing? Is
> this their way of trying to get the players to think twice about hitting
> from behind because of the severity of the penalty?
>
> BTW, I thought the mic on the officals was a great idea. How long have
> they been doing this? It's nice to hear the explination ( or is some cases
> justification) of a questionable call or for that matter, any
> call/non-call.
>
> Another seasoned "lurker"
> Kevin Coty
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kevin Coty "Earth, go figure"
> Molecular Genetics Dept --John Lithgow
> The Ohio State University
> Columbus, OH 43210 (614) 688-4227
> [log in to unmask] FAX (614) 292-4466
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|