Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:45:24 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Matt Evans replied to a previous message:
>> ************Eric J. Burton************ wrote
>>I can't believe that he isn't on a full ride, we pay enough taxes in
>>Minnesota to allow full scholarships. This makes me wounder what woog is
>>thinking.
>
>
>Woog is trying to put as many skates at Minnesota as he can. He had 29
>players on the roster, with 23 playing 18 or more games. The fourth line
>was a turnstyle all season with players being rotated in and out of the
>lineup. By offering a few players half scholarships Woog can have more
>players at his disposal, but some players who are offered partial
>scholarships slip away from him. (Chad Remackel of CC was one) The allure
>of playing for Minnesota allows him to do this.
>
>Most coaches
>18 scholarships -> 18 full scholarships -> 22 players
>
>Woog
>18 scholarships -> 12 full, 12 half -> 24 players on scholarship -> 29
>players
>
>(These numbers are made up)
>
>If you were a coach what would you prefer?
Matt's on the mark here.
I don't remember details offhand, but I seem to recall reading somewhere
this winter that the Gophers had only a couple players who weren't
receiving ANY scholarship money, so it's something like 26 or 27 players on
scholarship.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|