Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:49:05 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What I've heard is local linesmen and travelling refs -- at least in the
ECAC.
What will be interesting is the impact upon the D-III leagues as our better
officials get called up to the D-I ranks.
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lewin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: NCAA rules committee
> This, of course, is the crux of the matter. While I agree with what they
> are trying to do (which is get another pair of eyes on the ice to better
> and consistently enforce the rules), the problem becomes trying to figure
> out two referees instead of one. While each ref is different, the players
> usually are able to determine what each ref will or won't allow and adjust
> their play accordingly. How will they do that with two refs who's style
> may
> be contrary to one another's ?
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Todd Nielson <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Speaking as someone who follows ECAC hockey closest (and therefore can't
>> say
>> much about the other conferences), we have a hard enough time finding
>> enough
>> quality, consistent referees with the current system. Where are
>> competent
>> second referee's going to come from?
>>
>>
|
|
|