Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:03:27 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don't blame the NCAA here, Nathan. The good folks over at USA Hockey had
this one up for discussion at last year's rules meeting. It's based on a
pilot program from the Mass Select (Tier I) league. Fortunately, it was not
approved.
Joe LaCour
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hampton, Nathan E." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: NCAA rules committee
> That sounds like an NCAA discussion. Some team is being rewarded for a
> penalty by being able to ice it. I can agree with them completely if it
> was 5 on 5 skaters, but given that you have reduced the number of skaters
> by 20% (5 to 4) would it be made up and surpassed by the ability to ice
> the puck (which was a knee jerk rule to begin with way back when). To take
> the point of the discussion as if things were equal and then say there was
> a "REWARD" is pathetic ignorance only the NCAA could conjure up.
>
> Nathan Hampton
> ________________________________________
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
> [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Lewin [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NCAA rules committee
>
> If I remember correctly, the main point of the discussion was that the
> team
> that committed the penalty was actually being somewhat rewarded by having
> the option of icing the puck without restriction.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> At 6-6-2008 06:03 PM, Mark Lewin wrote:
>>
>>> There had been talk about prohibiting a penalized team from freely icing
>>> the puck but nothing in the CHN report addresses that issue so I guess
>>> it
>>> wasn't discussed.
>>>
>>
>> If memory serves, this was a WHA rule. Or maybe you had to get it past
>> the
>> blue line before you could ice it if you were on a man-down.
>>
>> Joe
>> --
>> Joe Makowiec can be reached at:
>> http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
>> http://makowiec.org/
>>
|
|
|