Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 21:55:26 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
no round 2 is 4 games over two days using 8 teams. If 2/3 is so bad why do
most all leagues use it to decide the early rounds? What does classes have
to do with it? The NCAA b-ball requires much more travel for many more
teams over more days. They also travel more often in season without
problems. Its only two days for round 1 and 1 day for round 2. Most kids I
know don't have any classes on fridays anyhow.. I know I sure didnt...
>On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Mike Patten wrote:
>
> > How about getting rid of the regionals altogether.
> > Lets go round 1 - 8 on campus best 2 of 3 .
> > round 2 - super regional idea. All 8 go to one site. 2 games each day.
> > finals - just like it is now...
>
>Best 2 of three on campus sites? Why bother. The home team will win
>probably 80% of the time. That may underestimate the home advantage.
>And let's see. Four games in four days? Who would pay to see four
>consecutive days of hockey. Who could attend them? And what about that
>little thing called classes.
>
>
> > >Yep. So would be OSU's palace. There could be a rotation period
> around the
> > >West as well as the East. I just don't like to see half empty houses for
> > >important games. I still shudder thinking of the 1992 West Regional
> at the
> > >Joe.
>
>I have given up trying to understand the attendance problem at the West
>Regionals. I take it on faith from the Western Hockey-L people that
>campus sites are the only thing that can work out West.
>
>But in the East, Worcester and Albany work fine for the Regionals. It
>makes no sense to try anywhere else, with the possible exception of
>Providence.
>
>In general however I have strong doubts that four regionals sites is going
>to work out. There still is an adequate fan base to support four regional
>sites, unless you cop out and go to campus sites. For the ECAC campus
>sites would be a disaster--there just are many arenas large enough to host
>them. HE would probably do OK with UMASS, UNH, BU, Providence and Lowell
>all having suitable venues. The only other place I could think of that
>might work is Buffalo's Marine Midland, home of the 2003 Frozen Four. But
>I think college hockey has only played one tournament in the arena, and I
>don't know the attendance.
>
>All in all, a tough proposition.
>******************************************************************************
>Brian Morris RPI Engineers--A February to Remember?
>[log in to unmask]
>
>HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
>[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
Time has little to do with infinity and Jelly Doughnuts
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|