Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 1996 12:11:09 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I disagree that this would be a good game. Union would blow Middlebury
out of the rink. You can't compare division 3 teams to division 1. This
pastbweekend Union played Mankato St. who just became division 1 this
year, and they beat them 8-2 and 6-1. There is a big difference in the
two leagues and I think people fail to realize that. It upsets me that you
would even say that Union vs Middlebury would be a good game. If Union
Middlebury would be a good game then so would Middlebury vs any team in HE
or ECAC.
On Fri, 27 Dec 1996, Richard Tuthill wrote:
> Jim's HOCKEY-L Schenectady Gazette article on Union College inspired an
> interesting thought that I'd like to share with folks.
>
> I'd really like to see Union play Middlebury next year. I know that with
> the NESCAC-driven ECAC East rule on practice not starting until November 1st
> for Middlebury, that would be a hard thing to accomplish schedule-wise. But
> maybe a holiday tournament match-up? The scholarship constraints on both
> colleges, their reputations for academic excellence, their small college
> campus ambiance, and their geographic proximity would make it a VERY
> interesting game. The similarities are striking.
>
> -- Dick Tuthill
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|