HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glen Keeney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 1994 00:12:19 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
   Corrections and comments are welcome.
 
   1994 Division I Conference Tournament formats and tiebreakers.
CCHA format and tiebreakers are same as last year.
WCHA #3 tiebreaker is a bit ambiguous; assume head-to-head.
HE   tiebreakers for more than 2 teams is not up to date since
       there are 3 games among some teams, 4 among others.
ECAC Confirmation from Bill Fenwick
##############################################################################
 
Conference Tournaments:           Feb   13 1994
 
CCHA Tournament: 1-12, 2-11, etc. 2/3; reseed then 3-6 4-5 then 1-4,2-3
                 No Consolation
   Tiebreakers:
      1 Head-head games
      2 Head-head goals
      3 Head-head vs #1, then #2, ...
      4 Coin Flip
   Based on current standings (UAF can be chosen by a higher seed):
      1 Mich     12 OSU        3 WMU    10 UIC      5 Miam 8 FSU
      2 MSU      11 Kent       4 LSSU    9 NtrDm    6 BGSU 7 UAF
 
WCHA Tournament: 1-10, 2-9, etc. 2/3; reseed? then 4-5 then 1-4 2-3
   Tiebreakers:
      1 Head-to-head records
      2 Wins in the league
      3 Total goals differential.
   Based on current standings:
      1 Minn     10 MiTech     3 Wisc    8 Denver   5 St.C 6 AK-An
      2 ColoCo    9 No.Dak     4 No.Mi   7 Mn-Dul
 
HE   Tournament: 1-8, 2-7, etc. 2/3 no OT; reseed? then 1-4, 2-3
   Tiebreakers - Two teams:
      1 League head-to-head won-loss record
      2 Best won-loss record vs. other Hockey East teams.
      3 Best record vs. other HE teams in descending order in standings.
      4 Coin flip
   Tiebreakers - More than two teams:
        The three-game record among the teams will determine the
        higher rank, applying the provisions under two teams.
   Based on current standings:
      1 BosUniv   8 BosColl    3 NoEst   6 Maine
      2 MaLowel   7 Merrmk     4 Prov    5 NewHamp
 
ECAC Tournament: 7-10, 8-9 single game; then 1-8, 2-7 etc. 2/3 no OT;
                 reseed then 1-4, 2-3
   Tiebreakers:  Bill Fenwick<[log in to unmask]> Jan 1993
      1 Head-to-head in ECAC games (tournaments, etc. excluded)
      2 Record against the top four teams in the conference.
      3 Record against the top eight teams in the conference.
      4 Goal differential, head-to-head.
      5 Goal differential against top four teams in the conference.
      6 Goal differential against top eight teams in the conference.
   Based on current standings:   Omit   12 Dartmth 11 Yale
      7 St.Law   10 Union      1 7-10    3 Clarksn  6 Colgate
      8 Princtn   9 Cornell    2 8-9     4 RPI      5 Vermont
*******************************************************************************
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2