Sorry to beat this thing to death but:
I suggested NC** reform before we talk about seceding. I suggested
that each NC** PROGRAM have one (Div I) rep at the NC** convention
and only those hockey reps would be able to vote on hockey issues,
synchro swimming reps pn synchro swimming issues, etc. On issues affecting
college athletics in general, each rep would get one vote and larger schools
(ie Okla., Michigan) would logically have more say than Clarkson or
Northern Mich. because more of their athletes would be affected. This
seems like a logical and equitable solution. Does anyone out there have
any thoughts on this suggestion?
 
Bri
Clarkson '95
[log in to unmask]
 
GO: Boston Bruins, Vancouver Canucks, Adirondack Red Wings, Clarkson
Golden Knights
 
LOSE!: Montreal Canadiens, Rochester Americans, Utica Devils, CD Islanders,
St Lawrence Saints
 
PS-Does anyone out there follow AHL minor hockey? IF so, let me
know personally, please.