HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David M. Josselyn" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David M. Josselyn
Date:
Wed, 16 Mar 1994 18:31:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Wed, 16 Mar 1994, Patrick Ellis wrote:
 
> I recently heard a rumor on campus that HE is still going to court to
> prove that their decision with maine was valid...  Does anyone have
> confirmaton of this, and any news on what may happen....
>
>     (would Maine even bother showing up to court now????)
 
No, I don't have confirmation, but I can't say I'm surprised.  The
injunction still seemed to me as more of a way of erring on the side of
caution, giving UMO the benefit of every possibly doubt. HE can't allow
that to stand as a precedent for member schools to take legal action
whenever they don't get the desired results in the league's democratic
process.  As a volunteer organization, I think HE will be painted into a
corner where they have to try and have the decision overturned or risk
looking like a repressive organization trying to beat in court what they
can't beat on the ice:  Walsh's hockey team.
 
BTW, I don't think that was the case - I'm saying that it could be
perceived that way if HE just takes the injunction on the chin and
forgets about it.
 
David M. Josselyn
[log in to unmask]
 
GO MERRIMACK!  GO ARGUS!  /\
                         /  \
                        /(*) \
                       /      \
                      /________\

ATOM RSS1 RSS2