Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Mar 1998 09:47:54 -0700 |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
i just noticed this...
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 758 games played through 03/21/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
Weight 35% 50% 15%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 Michigan State 40 31- 5- 4 82.50 ( 1) 51.22 (17) 51.01 (10) 62.14
2 North Dakota 38 30- 7- 1 80.26 ( 2) 51.69 (11) 50.93 (13) 61.58
3 Boston University 36 27- 7- 2 77.78 ( 3) 49.10 (30) 51.23 ( 8) 59.46
5 Boston College 38 25- 8- 5 72.37 ( 4) 50.11 (24) 51.56 ( 1) 58.12
11 Yale 34 23- 8- 3 72.06 ( 5) 43.51 (42) 49.06 (34) 54.33
4 Michigan 40 28-11- 1 71.25 ( 6) 51.30 (16) 51.23 ( 7) 58.27
6 Clarkson 33 22- 8- 3 71.21 ( 7) 49.37 (28) 49.06 (33) 56.97
10 Colorado College 40 25-12- 3 66.25 ( 8) 47.96 (34) 50.96 (12) 54.81
9 New Hampshire 34 22-11- 1 66.18 ( 9) 50.23 (23) 50.78 (18) 55.89
7 Ohio State 38 24-12- 2 65.79 (10) 51.56 (12) 51.10 ( 9) 56.47
8 Wisconsin 38 24-13- 1 64.47 (11) 51.39 (13) 51.45 ( 3) 55.98
16 Princeton 33 16-10- 7 59.09 (12) 47.54 (36) 48.71 (36) 51.76
12 St Cloud 38 20-16- 2 55.26 (16) 53.08 ( 7) 50.85 (16) 53.51
13 Northern Michigan 37 18-15- 4 54.05 (17) 52.48 ( 9) 50.77 (19) 52.77
14 Maine 33 15-14- 4 51.52 (19) 54.07 ( 3) 50.57 (24) 52.65
15 Northeastern 37 19-15- 3 55.41 (15) 49.77 (26) 50.83 (17) 51.90
17 Miami 36 18-14- 4 55.56 (14) 48.75 (32) 51.54 ( 2) 51.55
18 Minnesota-Duluth 38 19-17- 2 52.63 (18) 50.54 (22) 51.39 ( 4) 51.40
19 Notre Dame 40 17-19- 4 47.50 (22) 53.27 ( 6) 51.00 (11) 50.91
20 Harvard 33 14-17- 2 45.45 (27) 55.19 ( 1) 48.16 (41) 50.73
21 Minnesota 39 17-22- 0 43.59 (30) 54.71 ( 2) 50.77 (20) 50.22
22 Mass Lowell 36 16-17- 3 48.61 (20) 51.37 (14) 49.69 (27) 50.15
23 Rensselaer 34 17-13- 4 55.88 (13) 45.99 (39) 48.59 (37) 49.84
24 Lake Superior 36 15-17- 4 47.22 (23) 50.91 (21) 50.65 (22) 49.58
25 Providence 36 15-18- 3 45.83 (26) 51.04 (18) 49.73 (26) 49.02
26 Brown 31 13-16- 2 45.16 (28) 51.31 (15) 48.72 (35) 48.77
27 Ferris State 38 15-20- 3 43.42 (31) 51.76 (10) 50.64 (23) 48.67
28 Cornell 32 14-16- 2 46.88 (24) 49.16 (29) 48.51 (39) 48.26
29 Colgate 33 14-15- 4 48.48 (21) 47.32 (37) 49.35 (28) 48.04
30 Michigan Tech 37 14-20- 3 41.89 (32) 49.93 (25) 51.28 ( 5) 47.32
31 Mankato State 30 12-15- 3 45.00 (29) 46.75 (38) 48.36 (40) 46.38
32 Denver 36 11-23- 2 33.33 (34) 52.69 ( 8) 50.12 (25) 45.53
33 Dartmouth 29 11-13- 5 46.55 (25) 43.53 (41) 49.15 (31) 45.43
34 St Lawrence 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 54.02 ( 4) 47.84 (42) 45.12
35 Merrimack 37 10-26- 1 28.38 (38) 53.90 ( 5) 49.12 (32) 44.25
36 Vermont 34 10-20- 4 35.29 (33) 48.85 (31) 49.20 (30) 44.16
37 Western Michigan 37 10-25- 2 29.73 (37) 51.03 (20) 50.90 (15) 43.55
38 Alaska-Fairbanks 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 48.61 (33) 51.23 ( 6) 42.93
39 Bowling Green 37 7-27- 3 22.97 (42) 51.03 (19) 50.67 (21) 41.16
40 Alaska-Anchorage 36 6-25- 5 23.61 (40) 49.76 (27) 50.90 (14) 40.78
41 Mass Amherst 31 5-23- 3 20.97 (43) 47.94 (35) 49.33 (29) 38.71
42 Union 30 5-21- 4 23.33 (41) 45.45 (40) 48.58 (38) 38.18
43 Air Force 12 3- 9- 0 25.00 (39) 36.44 (44) 46.70 (43) 33.98
44 Army 17 2-15- 0 11.76 (44) 42.09 (43) 46.07 (44) 32.07
Average 48.68 49.72 49.96 49.39
Standard Deviation 17.31 3.55 1.33 6.73
range 11.76 36.44 46.07
to 82.50 55.19 51.56
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
This calculation includes only teams eligible for the NCAA tournament.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|