HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 1995 17:36:09 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Robert Constantine writes:
 
>The key sequence in the game came late in the second period when after a
>wild scramble in front of the UNH net, the puck ended across the Wildcat
>goal line. Referee Bob Fowkes immediatly waved off the goal saying that
>the puck had been kicked in. Maine Coach Shawn Walsh took exception to
>this interpretation, at one point grabbing a stick and pointing to the
>spot (near the heel?) where he claimed it had hit, and thence into the net.
>My take on this is that Fowkes may have invoked the now rarely-seen "kick
>shot" rule, which disallows a puck which has been propelled into the net
>by a stick pushed forward by a kicking motion from being called a legal goal.
 
If this were the case, then by the rules (4.4.a and 6.27.a), Fowkes should
have called a misconduct on whoever "kick-shot" the puck.
 
"Rarely seen" is right -- I had never even HEARD of this type of shot before
perusing the rule book, and I have certainly never seen it attempted.
--
Disclaimer -- Unless otherwise noted, all opinions expressed above are
              strictly those of:
 
Bill Fenwick                        |  Send your HOCKEY-L poll responses to:
Cornell '86 and '94.5               |  [log in to unmask]
LET'S GO RED!!                                                  DJF  5/27/94
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million type-
 writers, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare."
-- Blair Houghton

ATOM RSS1 RSS2