HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Comstrike <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Comstrike <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jan 1995 20:12:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On Fri, 20 Jan 1995, Bill Fenwick wrote:
 
> Bob Hall writes:
>
> >Several years ago I had the chance to mention the possibility to UT Athletic
> >Director Al Bohl, who made it clear in no uncertain terms that varsity hockey
> >would never be a part of UT's plan ("You can't show me a program that makes
> >money").
>
> I may be missing something, but aren't there a number of Division I hockey
> programs that make money?  I know Cornell does, or at least they have in the
> recent past.  I was under the impression that hockey was considered a revenue
> sport (though at nowhere near the level of football and basketball) by every-
> body but the NC$$, who insists on lumping it in with "other minor sports."
>
> Granted, starting up a varsity hockey program would probably be a costly
> undertaking...
> --
> Disclaimer -- Unless otherwise noted, all opinions expressed above are
>               strictly those of:
>
> Bill Fenwick                        |  Send your HOCKEY-L poll responses to:
> Cornell '86 and '94.5               |  [log in to unmask]
> LET'S GO RED!!                                                  DJF  5/27/94
> "I used to think the brain was the most important organ in the body, 'til I
>  realized, yeah, look what's telling me that."
> -- Emo Phillips
UT has never been a place that has shown much forsight in money matters.
Nathan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2