In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask] (Droopy) writes:
|> The announced seedings were
|> EAST
|> 1) Maine
|> 2) BU
|> 3) Harvard
|> 4) Clarkson
|> 5) Brown
|> 6) WIsconsin
|This is the most ridiculous thing for Brown to get a bid over RPI.  RPI overall had a much better season then Brown and shouldn't be denied a bid because of just losing to two top teams this past weekend in the ECAC tournament.  A season isn't decided on one game which is what the committee seems to have done as Brown upset Harvard.  RPI had a great season this year beating HARVARD, CLARKSON, St. Lawerence twice, Brown, and tieing the number 2 team in the east regional BU.  Comparing that to Brown I do no
t see as many big wins as RPI had which is a major reason why RPI should be in and not Brown.  Also Brown came in fourth in the conference behind RPI who ended up a solid second in the conference with more overall wins as RPI ended up the year with 20 wins and 11 loses and Brown ended up wining only 17 games and also losing 11 with conference records of 15-6-1 and 13-7-2 respectively.  Brown is a quality team but a team that had one big win this year and it is a disgrace that the selection committee only t
ook this into account and not a look at what the two teams did throughout the whole season.