Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 1997 14:44:10 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm not sure what the exact answer to this is, but I do know that Clarkson had
a freshman last year who was 21 years of age. I'd be interested to know if he
lost any eligibility.
Regards,
Dan Olsen
[log in to unmask]
08/07/97 02:23 PM
Please respond to [log in to unmask] @ internet
To: [log in to unmask] @ internet
cc:
Subject: Older freshmen
A few years ago a Cornell defenseman (Steve Inglehart) lost his final year
of eligibility because, I think, he had played Junior B after his 20th
birthday. I do not know what the exact letter of the law was then (or more
to the point what it is now), but there is some strict limitation on how
old a freshman can be (I think, contingent upon his experience in organized
hockey but... I don't really know).
Would someone with rulebook at hand quote the current policy? Mike?
Arthur? Else?
Thanks in advance,
-- Greg (bound for Oregon... anybody on this entire list in Oregon..? :-)
BTW, is there a limit on how *young* an NCAA athlete can be? I just figure
that, with high school seniors jumping to the pros in squeakball, the
logical extension is for a high school sophomore to take a high school
graduation equivalency exam and pop up in the back court at Kentucky, age
15.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|