Now that St. Lawrence has beaten Clarkson, and Cornell has
already beaten St. Lawrence, I guess that kind of makes up
for Clarkson beating Cornell? Since Clarkson is ranked higher
now (before the loss) than they were when they beat Cornell,
I guess that means that this eventuality (the wins and losses
in the order stated above) is *better* for Cornell than if
the games ended the same way, but in a different order in time?
 
I guess this makes sense, but if anybody wants to help me
(and anybody else) figure this out, feel free.
 
howard
Princeton'87 Cornell'91'92
Let's go RED!