HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robb Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robb Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jan 1997 11:04:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
> > > One can only imagine what an Army team that was not "decidedly
> > > lesser" could do.  However, not too shabby that a team composed
> > > solely of players from the United States can tie the two top ranked
> > > teams in the ECAC, eh?
> >
> > Army has 2 problems with garnering respect, no matter what they do.  First,
> > the Indies just don't get broad-based respect either in the public mind or
> > in ratings.  Second, when Army *was* in the ECAC, they were guite
> > un-gratuitously awful.  (Not that Cornell handled them then, either... :-)
>
> And then there's the fact that despite passing problems and not
> capitalizing on opportunities, Cornell thoroughly outskated Army.  When
> Chad Wilson can outskate two Army forwards in a rush to the puck, you
> know your team has a speed problem.
>
> Yes, respect is tough to come by, but sometimes one team just isn't as good
> as others.
>
> Jeffrey
>
 
 
Just as we all know (whether we want to admit it or not) that Michigan is
actually a better team than Cornell.....
 
Let's Go Red!
 
Robb Newman
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2