HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Billy Lustgarten <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:24:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
An RPI player got called for a 10 minute misconduct, while slightly later
a Cornell player got whistled for a 5 minute charging major.  Obviously,
the 5 min major left Cornell with one less man for 5 mins, while the 10
min penalty did not effect the RPI manpower on the ice.
 
        My question is what is the difference between a 5 and a 10 to the
referee?  As a team, a 5 min major would hurt more than the 10.
 
                                                        Billy Lustgarten
                                                        Cornell '98
On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Arthur C. Mintz wrote:
 
> Penalties
> ---------
>  803 R Garver (misconduct - 10)
 
>  847 C Dailey (charging - major)
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2