Even more interesting (looking at the numbers) is why SLU has so few PP
opportunities!  10 fewer than the nearest other team, and almost 20% less
than the league average!  Does SLU tend to take a bunch of matching minors?
Any other ideas?
 
Steve G
-------------
Original Text
From [log in to unmask] (The College Hockey Discussion List), on
2/8/96 12:30 PM:
Current ECAC powerplay standings (league games only):
 
     Cornell         28-91      30.8
     St. Lawrence    21-77      27.3
     Rensselaer      26-121     21.5
     Clarkson        20-100     20.0
     Harvard         19-99      19.2
     Dartmouth       18-97      18.6
     Brown           17-93      18.3
     Colgate         17-103     16.5
     Princeton       14-87      16.1
     Yale            13-88      14.8
     Union           12-87      13.8
     Vermont         13-96      13.5
 
I know why Cornell's powerplay is #1 -- they are 200 times more
aggressive than they were under McCutcheon.
 
But why is UVM's so terrible?  I would think that Perrin/St.Louis would
just clean up with so much empty ice.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.