Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 19 Mar 1995 00:36:40 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Selection Eve, here's an RPICH update. I present, for your perusal, two
versions of the rating incorporating all games through Saturday night. The
first presumes that LSSU will win the CCHA tournament on Sunday, the second
presumes that MSU will prevail. The correct set should duplicate the
numbers that the committee will work with on Sunday afternoon. Enjoy!
This will be the final RPICH update for the season.
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
First, presuming that Lake Superior defeats Michigan State on Sunday:
Rating Percentage Index for College Hockey, compiled by Erik Biever
This report includes the 763 games through 03/19/95 between teams eligible
for the Division 1 tournament.
Opp OppOpp
G W L T Win% Win% Win% RPICH
1 Boston University 37 28- 6- 3 .7973 .5273 .5094 .5903
2 Michigan 36 28- 7- 1 .7917 .5107 .4988 .5780
3 Maine 40 29- 5- 6 .8000 .4991 .5086 .5767
4 Minnesota 41 23-13- 5 .6220 .5576 .5080 .5613
5 New Hampshire 35 22- 9- 4 .6857 .5259 .5021 .5599
6 Colorado College 42 30-11- 1 .7262 .4943 .5093 .5560
7 Michigan State 38 24-11- 3 .6711 .5078 .4952 .5455
8 Clarkson 35 22- 9- 4 .6857 .4964 .4994 .5445
9 Wisconsin 41 23-14- 4 .6098 .5274 .5110 .5439
10 Lake Superior 39 22-11- 6 .6410 .5089 .4994 .5396
11 Denver 40 24-14- 2 .6250 .5038 .5172 .5374
12 Bowling Green 37 24-11- 2 .6757 .4700 .4991 .5287
13 Northeastern 35 16-14- 5 .5286 .5333 .5078 .5257
14 Vermont 35 19-14- 2 .5714 .5011 .4964 .5175
15 Princeton 33 17-13- 3 .5606 .5075 .4937 .5173
16 North Dakota 39 18-18- 3 .5000 .5225 .5133 .5146
17 Brown 30 15-12- 3 .5500 .5006 .4952 .5116
18 RPI 35 18-13- 4 .5714 .4817 .4889 .5059
19 Colgate 36 19-16- 1 .5417 .4880 .4942 .5030
20 Miami 39 18-15- 6 .5385 .4856 .4952 .5012
21 St Cloud 38 17-20- 1 .4605 .5164 .5114 .5012
22 Providence 37 14-17- 6 .4595 .5227 .4982 .5008
23 Harvard 30 14-14- 2 .5000 .4943 .4962 .4962
24 Mass Lowell 40 17-19- 4 .4750 .5040 .4996 .4956
25 Michigan Tech 38 14-20- 4 .4211 .5246 .5097 .4950
26 Western Michigan 38 15-18- 5 .4605 .5107 .4950 .4942
27 Minnesota-Duluth 38 16-18- 4 .4737 .4869 .5168 .4911
28 St Lawrence 30 12-17- 1 .4167 .5225 .4958 .4894
29 Merrimack 34 13-16- 5 .4559 .4969 .4977 .4868
30 Cornell 28 10-14- 4 .4286 .4940 .4928 .4774
31 Dartmouth 27 9-16- 2 .3704 .4997 .4987 .4671
32 Ferris State 36 12-20- 4 .3889 .4883 .4993 .4662
33 Northern Michigan 39 12-24- 3 .3462 .5039 .5106 .4662
34 Boston College 35 11-22- 2 .3429 .5085 .5035 .4658
35 Illinois-Chicago 37 11-22- 4 .3514 .4889 .4985 .4569
36 Alaska-Anchorage 36 11-25- 0 .3056 .4962 .5087 .4517
37 Yale 28 8-17- 3 .3393 .4842 .4973 .4512
38 Union 28 8-16- 4 .3571 .4652 .4929 .4451
39 Notre Dame 35 9-25- 1 .2714 .4897 .4946 .4364
40 Alaska-Fairbanks 29 7-21- 1 .2586 .4730 .4881 .4232
41 Ohio State 36 6-28- 2 .1944 .4985 .4910 .4206
42 Mass Amherst 34 6-27- 1 .1912 .4867 .4997 .4161
43 Air Force 21 5-15- 1 .2619 .4094 .4853 .3915
44 Army 11 1-10- 0 .0909 .3692 .4788 .3270
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Now, presuming that Michigan State defeats Lake Superior:
Rating Percentage Index for College Hockey, compiled by Erik Biever
This report includes the 763 games through 03/19/95 between teams eligible
for the Division 1 tournament.
Opp OppOpp
G W L T Win% Win% Win% RPICH
1 Boston University 37 28- 6- 3 .7973 .5273 .5093 .5903
2 Michigan 36 28- 7- 1 .7917 .5108 .4989 .5780
3 Maine 40 29- 5- 6 .8000 .4991 .5086 .5767
4 Minnesota 41 23-13- 5 .6220 .5582 .5079 .5616
5 New Hampshire 35 22- 9- 4 .6857 .5259 .5020 .5599
6 Colorado College 42 30-11- 1 .7262 .4943 .5094 .5560
7 Michigan State 38 25-10- 3 .6974 .5078 .4956 .5521
8 Clarkson 35 22- 9- 4 .6857 .4964 .4993 .5444
9 Wisconsin 41 23-14- 4 .6098 .5274 .5109 .5439
10 Denver 40 24-14- 2 .6250 .5038 .5171 .5374
11 Lake Superior 39 21-12- 6 .6154 .5089 .4993 .5331
12 Bowling Green 37 24-11- 2 .6757 .4718 .4991 .5296
13 Northeastern 35 16-14- 5 .5286 .5325 .5078 .5254
14 Princeton 33 17-13- 3 .5606 .5075 .4936 .5173
15 Vermont 35 19-14- 2 .5714 .5003 .4964 .5171
16 North Dakota 39 18-18- 3 .5000 .5225 .5133 .5146
17 Brown 30 15-12- 3 .5500 .5006 .4952 .5116
18 RPI 35 18-13- 4 .5714 .4817 .4889 .5059
19 Colgate 36 19-16- 1 .5417 .4880 .4940 .5029
20 St Cloud 38 17-20- 1 .4605 .5164 .5114 .5012
21 Miami 39 18-15- 6 .5385 .4849 .4955 .5009
22 Providence 37 14-17- 6 .4595 .5227 .4982 .5007
23 Harvard 30 14-14- 2 .5000 .4943 .4963 .4962
24 Mass Lowell 40 17-19- 4 .4750 .5040 .4995 .4956
25 Michigan Tech 38 14-20- 4 .4211 .5239 .5097 .4946
26 Western Michigan 38 15-18- 5 .4605 .5091 .4953 .4935
27 Minnesota-Duluth 38 16-18- 4 .4737 .4869 .5167 .4911
28 St Lawrence 30 12-17- 1 .4167 .5216 .4958 .4889
29 Merrimack 34 13-16- 5 .4559 .4969 .4977 .4869
30 Cornell 28 10-14- 4 .4286 .4950 .4927 .4778
31 Dartmouth 27 9-16- 2 .3704 .4997 .4985 .4671
32 Boston College 35 11-22- 2 .3429 .5085 .5034 .4658
33 Northern Michigan 39 12-24- 3 .3462 .5033 .5105 .4658
34 Ferris State 36 12-20- 4 .3889 .4875 .4993 .4658
35 Illinois-Chicago 37 11-22- 4 .3514 .4907 .4984 .4578
36 Alaska-Anchorage 36 11-25- 0 .3056 .4962 .5087 .4517
37 Yale 28 8-17- 3 .3393 .4842 .4972 .4512
38 Union 28 8-16- 4 .3571 .4652 .4928 .4451
39 Notre Dame 35 9-25- 1 .2714 .4898 .4948 .4364
40 Alaska-Fairbanks 29 7-21- 1 .2586 .4749 .4882 .4242
41 Ohio State 36 6-28- 2 .1944 .4986 .4913 .4207
42 Mass Amherst 34 6-27- 1 .1912 .4867 .4996 .4160
43 Air Force 21 5-15- 1 .2619 .4094 .4855 .3915
44 Army 11 1-10- 0 .0909 .3692 .4789 .3271
RPICH is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method, used as a tool
in selecting teams for the national collegiate tournaments in basketball,
baseball, and hockey. Ratings are derived by summing each team's winning
percentage, the average winning percentage of its opponents, and the average
winning percentage of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by 25%, 50%, and
25% respectively. Factors such as home ice and margin of victory are not
included. No individual game is weighted more heavily than any other.
Copyright 1995 Erik Biever. RPICH is freely available for personal use;
republication without permission is prohibited
-- Erik
|
|
|