HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
larry latour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Mar 1994 09:07:10 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
In an article by Mike Dowd of the Bangor Daily News, Friday,
March 4, 1994, I quote:
 
===================================================
 
 
 Walsh said Maine has a plan to offer the Hockey East ADs that
may aid the Black Bears' chances of being allowed to participate
in the tournament.
 
 "An option that may be considered is for the first-place team to
have a choice of facing either the eighth-place team during the
season or the eighth-place team because of the forfeits," said
Walsh.
 
 "Then the second-place team gets the same choice right down to
the fourth-place team."
 
 Walsh pointed out a similar option-system exists in the
Central Collegiate Hockey Association when Alaska-Fairbanks,
only an affilated (sic?) member of the league, participates
in the postseason tournament.
 
 Walsh also said Hockey East faces a major decision in
deciding if its members will accept the points from
the Maine games.  If they do, it could rearrange the
standings.
 
There is no  precedent in Hockey East for keeping a team out
of the postseason tournament for major violations, let alone
the secondary ones of which Maine is accused.
 
UMass-Lowell was found guilty of major violations a couple of
years ago and banned from the NCAA Tournament, but was still
allowed to participate in the Hockey East tournament.
 
==========================================
 
What do people think of these suggestions? facts?
Remember, don't shoot the messenger.
 
Larry Latour
UMaine

ATOM RSS1 RSS2