 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 1993 09:20:36 PST |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The SOS Rating is obtained by adding a team's winning percentage
to the aggregate winning percentage of opponents they have faced
(not including head-to-head contests with that opponent).
NOTE: Mercyurst (2 wins), Hobart (1 win) and Scranton (2 losses)
have played games against unknown opponents. While the results
of those games are reflected in each teams Win %, their SOS %
remains unaffected.
SOS ECAC West/SUNYAC Ratings
Games through 1/27/93
Ranking Team Rating Win SOS Change
Now Prev % %
1 1 Plattsburgh 1.457 .867 .590 +.035
2 2 Mercyhurst 1.379 .800 .579 +.056
3 4 Elmira 1.259 .750 .509 +.064
4 5 Cortland 1.196 .786 .410 +.014
5 3 Cansisius 1.188 .700 .488 -.079
6 6 Hobart 1.172 .667 .505 +.065
7 7 RIT 1.036 .531 .505 -.006
8 8 Oswego 0.959 .531 .428 +.056
9 9 Potsdam 0.951 .458 .513 +.049
10 10 Fredonia 0.903 .400 .503 +.048
11 11 Brockport 0.738 .267 .471 -.022
12 12 Geneseo 0.716 .250 .466 -.026
13 13 St. Bonas 0.580 .125 .455 -.015
14 14 Scranton 0.407 .000 .407 +.002
Based entirely on winning percentages, the standings would be
(interesting because these would have been the official
standings had the ECAC West stayed intact):
Now Prev
1 1 Plattsburgh .867
2 4 Mercyhurst .800
3 3 Cortland .786
4 5 Elmira .750
5 2 Cansisius .700
6 6 Hobart .667
7 8 Oswego .531
7t 7 RIT .531
9 9 Potsdam .458
10 10 Fredonia .400
11 12 Brockport .267
12 11 Geneseo .250
13 13 St. Bonas .125
14 14 Scranton .000
And who's had the toughest (and easiest ) schedule to date?
Here they are, hardest to easiest:
Now Prev
1 2 Plattsburgh .590 (Opponent's winning %)
2 1 Mercyhurst .579
3 5 Potsdam .514
4 8 Elmira .509
5 3 Hobart .505
5t 6 RIT .505
7 7 Fredonia .503
8 10 Cansisius .488
9 4 Brockport .471
10 9 Geneseo .466
11 11 St. Bonas .455
12 13 Oswego .428
13 14 Cortland .410
14 12 Scranton .405
Chris Lerch
Xerox
RIT '84 & '91
|
|
|
