Charles Sackett wrote:

>You make many very strong and valid points; however, if Wisconsin's defense 
>is such a testament (or reason) to Elliott's play...then why did Connelly 
>fare so poorly when he took over during Elliott's injury?  I don't believe 
>that he was even marginal.
>
>I agree...the defense is very strong....but if you have seen him as of late 
>(returned to his previous form, might I add) it would be hard to argue that 
>he has the ability to singlehandedly win a game.  (As does David McKee, 
>might I add.)
>  
>
True, but the couple of times I saw Wisconsin while Elliott was out, 
they weren't playing nearly as well.


-- 
J. Michael Neal
http://idonotlikeyoueither.blogspot.com/