I always thought Mercyhurst should throw in a bid with the folks at Hershey
for the East Regional.  Great arena with a fan base deep enough to draw the
required 5-7K curious Hershey Bears season ticket holders.  Within New
England and most ECACHL schools driving distance, so could potentially fill
the barn.  

Also, nice to see Bridgeport get the regionals in 2009 before we bring the
Phrozen Phour to WDC two weeks later.  

-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Lewin
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: NCAA sponsorship of regionals

What is involved in a school's sponsorship of an NCAA regional?  Is it
money, manpower or both?

We had this discussion during an extremely boring ECAC semifinal
(Harvard
10 - Dartmouth 1) and no-one knew the answer.  The staging of the
regionals
every other year has always been sponsored by RPI, never by Union or a
collaboration of the two.  The benefit of sponsorship is that RPI would
automatically be placed in the Albany regional if they ever again
qualify
for the tournament.  It just seems to me that sponsorship would be a
good
investment for a school if the cost wasn't too high (unless of course
the
school administration places absolutely value in the school's sports
program).

Also, since another perennial site for regionals is in Worcester, why is
BU
always the sponsor?  BU, BC, UNH and Maine are often in the tournament.
Wouldn't it make sense for one of the other schools to rotate the
sponsorship?
BC always seems to be coming to regionals in Albany since BU has
Worcester
all locked up.

Perhaps the rules do not allow schools to sponsor the sharing of
sponsorship
since that might restrict the seedings of the tournament if multiple
schools
sponsored a specific site/