HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Josh Kleinbaum <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Josh Kleinbaum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:45:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
At 09:49 PM 2/17/98 -0600, John Edwards wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Randy May wrote:
>
>> Now that women's programs are cropping up all over (or are rumored to) how
>> will this affect title IV? (or vice versa) will schools have to award
varsity
>> status to one mens program too?
>
>The main effect of the increase in women's hockey on Title IX will be
>that the schools who add it will be closer to compliance, but probably
>still not there. I believe it was said last year that in D-I*, only Army and
>Air Force are currently in compliance, and that is largely because their
>male-female ratio is skewed towards males.
>
 
To tackle the title ix problem, men's soccer will be moved up with women's
hockey.  actually, the general consensus in ann arbor, from people on both
club women's hockey and club soccer, is that they're really only moving the
hockey to varsity so they can upgrade soccer.
 
                                        -josh
 
-------------------
 
"We're not Eastern Michigan University, but we're close."
 
-slogan seen on billboard for Washtenaw Community College
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2