Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 3 Mar 1996 02:08:09 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-- [ From: Adam Wodon * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --
> On the upside, I think the between play updates from
> Appleton Arena really helped give the Knights and the fans
> the incentive to hold on for a tie and try for a win.
> When the announcer gave the final score (Cornell 5, SLU
> 4) the crowd went wild and the Knights knew that holding
> onto the tie would give them 2nd place.
Also interesting to note that Colgate no longer had anything to play
for at this point - knowing that a Cornell tie or win meant they
couldn't take 4th -- so, the description of a "tired overtime" could
also be attributed to both teams knowing the tie was good enough. All
Colgate's incentive was to win to knock Clarkson to 3rd, but difference
did it make to them. I'm not saying neither team tried to score, but,
really, I could see the intensity not being the same.
AW
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|