Date: 15 Mar 95 17:26:18 EST
From:  <PBLAKE AT FCCJ.BITNET>
To:    <HOCKEY-L AT MAINE>
Subject: Uncl: building a better rating system
 
From:  PATRICK BLAKE
 
With all of this talk lately about RPICH and others & and how they *all* seem
to be so "unfair" in various respects, how difficult would it be for an
informed math/stats guru to develop a new method which takes all of the
meaningful criteria into account?
 
Also, if the existing methods aren't meaningful enough, why hasn't someone in
a position to change it taken any step in the right direction?
 
Just a thought... but maybe it boils down to "you can't please all the people
all of the time"
 
Patrick L. Blake
[log in to unmask] OR [log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]