Date: 15 Mar 95 17:26:18 EST
From: <PBLAKE AT FCCJ.BITNET>
To: <HOCKEY-L AT MAINE>
Subject: Uncl: building a better rating system
From: PATRICK BLAKE
With all of this talk lately about RPICH and others & and how they *all* seem
to be so "unfair" in various respects, how difficult would it be for an
informed math/stats guru to develop a new method which takes all of the
meaningful criteria into account?
Also, if the existing methods aren't meaningful enough, why hasn't someone in
a position to change it taken any step in the right direction?
Just a thought... but maybe it boils down to "you can't please all the people
all of the time"
Patrick L. Blake
[log in to unmask] OR [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]