In article <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
>So, this weekend when the Lynah Faithful are wondering whom to root
>for in all the other games, here's a simple guide, based on the
>assumption that Cornell is going to lose to Vermont. Which, in fact,
>they will.
>
>> If Princeton loses twice and Cornell beats Dartmouth and not
>Vermont, the Big Red would finish tenth if the Catamounts finish in
>the top four.
>
>> (UVM) Clinches fourth with a sweep if Clarkson, Yale, and
>St.Lawrence all lose twice.
>
>OK, so what we need here is:
>
>1. UVM d. Cornell
>2. Cornell d. Dartmouth
>3. Union d. Princeton
 
I don't want to discredit Union, but are you serious about this one??  It
would take no shortage of miracles.
 
>4. RPI d. Princeton
>5. Harvard d. Clarkson
>6. Brown d. Clarkson
>7. Harvard d. SLU
>8. Brown d. SLU
>9. Union d. Yale
 
Again, are you kidding?  This one is MUCH more unlikely than the first.  I'm
not saying Union couldn't do it, but it is so unlikely that I would perhaps
go so far as to put money on it.  (Boy, would I be embarassed if Union won
either of these games.)
 
>10. RPI d. Yale
>11. UVM d. Colgate
>
>Not bad - 11 of the 12 games are significant (Colgate-Dartmouth can
>do whatever they want). Gotta love a deterministic universe.
>
>Greg
>Somerville, MA
>Let's Go Red!!!
 
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Orchard-Hays        Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute             '95
"Wise men store up knowledge, but the mouth of a fool invites ruin."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------