Gee.  That's too bad.  And here I thought I was getting the news by
reading it.

At one time, I had a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, and read
the NYT on the web.  The differences in viewpoint was astounding - one
would think they were reporting on news from two different countries.
The factual reporting was the same, but the spin on the article, and the
choice of what to feature or not, represents the great political divide
between the far left and far right.  In the end, with my liberal bias, I
find the NYT a more agreeable way to get the news than the WSJ.

Of course, neither is worth the paper its written on for hockey content.

Tom Rowe
--------------------------------------------
Sure I'm a solipcist.  But that's
just one man's opinion.
--------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Woodbury
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NY Times - "A Dispute of Great Spirit Rages On"

Naw. The New York Times is a rag. Can't believe anything in it.

Bob Griebel wrote:

> Does anyone close to this have a comment on whether the NY Times's 
> representations of fact are accurate and justified?
>
> Bob Griebel
>
>
>
> Eric J. Burton wrote:
>
>> Nothing new here just a review of the issues already surrounding the 
>> UND name.
>>  
>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Indy Rutks
>>
>> The NY Times weighs in (again?) on the Fighting Sioux:
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/26/sports/hockey/26sioux.html?pagewant
>> ed=all
>>
>> -Indy
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>