Mark

I do not think they'd reseed.  What I envision is like hoops where there is
a 3 year rotation on who plays who in the semifinals, or, common sense (!)
where we've set up #'s 1 & 4 bracket to meet in semi #1 and 2 & 3's bracket
to meet in semi #2.

Joe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lewin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: NCAA Gives Final Approval to 16-Team NCAA Tournament


> Madison may be a good choice but, to the best of my knowledge, the NCAA
has requirements of all sites to ban serving of alcohol and to make sure all
commercial advertisements are covered.  At the Pepsi in Albany, where each
seat has a drink holder whose base advertises a particular brand of beer,
employees were required to cover the ad on every seat in the house before
the NCAA event started.
>
> On a different note, this decision kind of pisses me off.
> After 5 years of running the NC$$ contest, I've finally reduced the whole
contest to a single Excel spreadsheet.
> I cut and paste each entry as I receive it and plug in the game scores and
everything is automatically calculated.  Now that they've changed the
format, I have to revisit the spreadsheet
> (affectionately referred to in my house as "the Beast") in order to
accommodate the new format.
> One of the things that will really throw off the contest is if they hold 4
regionals (which is their intent) and then re-seed
> for the semis/finals.
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> Date:          Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:20:36 -0500
>
> >> West
> >> ??????
> >>
> >Why not St. Cloud? 6,000 seats should be enough and then finally the
Huskies might win a regional game.
> >Madison would be my #1 choice. Fun town and if the Dane Co. Arena, can
drink beer!
> >Anaheim -- if a frozen four, why not?
> >Denver (send the Avs out of town for a while)
> >Omaha -- I've got to see what all the hubbub is about
> >Milwaukee -- (see Anaheim)
> >avoid Michigan, please.
> >
> >Nathan Hampton
> >
> >> ----------
> >> From:         Joseph LaCour
> >> Reply To:     Joseph LaCour
> >> Sent:         Friday, April 26, 2002 7:47 AM
> >> To:   [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject:      Re: NCAA Gives Final Approval to 16-Team NCAA Tournament
> >>
> >> Now that it is good 2 go, let's decide on where to put the 2 other
> >> regionals.
> >>
> >> East
> >> Providence
> >> Albany (not sure -- may have hoops action)
> >> Trenton or Philly (Spectrum)
> >> Hartford
> >>
> >> West
> >> ??????
> >>
> >> Now for the fun part -- make up a schedule that maximizes TV exposure.
> >>
> >> Joe LaCour
> >> Clarkson '77/78
> >> 2003 on the way to Division III!!
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "John T. Whelan" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:19 AM
> >> Subject: I: NCAA Gives Final Approval to 16-Team NCAA Tournament
> >>
> >>
> >> > The NCAA Division I Board of Directors approved the proposal to
expand
> >> > the Men's Division I Ice Hockey Torunament from 12 to 16 teams,
> >> > according to
> >> >
> >> > http://www.ncaa.org/releases/makepage.cgi/divi/2002042501d1.htm
> >> >
> >> > I believe this was the last hurdle it needed to clear, and we can now
> >> > say it's official.
> >> >                                         JTW
> >>
> >>
> >