HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:33:18 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Okay, let's get really pickey here!  :-)

At the time the puck was coming under the goaltender, no SCSCU player had
"possession" it deflected off of Blackburn.  So, how does the rule apply
then?


HOCKEY!!!! -- GO GOPHERS!!!
kam
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Flickinger
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: rules question
>
>
> --- kam wrote:
> I agree, Mark.  The SCSU player was not "standing" in the crease when the
> goal went in.  He was moving through that corner of it.  He was not
> interferring with the play.  I say it was a goal.
> --- end of quote ---
>
> The NCAA does not use the new NHL rule which allows for discretion of the
> referee regarding interference. You yourself say he was "moving
> through that
> corner of it." That seems to pretty much qualify him as "skating
> through the
> goal crease while the attacking team has possession of the puck."
>
> Therefore, no goal is the correct call.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2