I believe that the concept of "regional" venues is for the semi's is a
failure and should be scrapped.  The higher seeds should retain home ice.
 
Shifting the site of the phinal phour is fine.  It is the only event
worthy of special treatment.
 
From what I recall this is how it used to be done.  Anyone have any
revenue statistics from the past to compare with recent revenues (dollar
figures adjusted or inflation, of course :))???????
 
 
c-ya
zorak
 
On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, David Naghski wrote:
 
>>
> 1) Attendance (or possible attendance) is listed as a reason for staying at
> campus sites.  However, it seems that discussion concerning "campus sites"
> has only included two campuses: Mich St. and Mich. Does anyone have a
> feeling for what attendance would be at these sites if neither MSU or UM
> made the tournament?  I know people on this list would say "sure" but there
> was a lot of discussion about a large percentage of the fans really being
> there to only see "their" team, ie leaving after the first game or not
> coming in until the second game was starting (in both the East and West).
>
> Anyway, any comments are appreciated.  This did seem like an interesting topic.
>
> Dave Naghski
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
>
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.