----------
> >> I see .... and where does Michigan fall into this lovely dichotomy,
> may
> >
> >Hey, I suspect that if the NCAA Div. I programs were ranked top to
> bottom
> >by median SAT of admittees (for example), Michigan would do quite
> nicely.
>
> I'm not saying they wouldn't --- the sarcastic point I was trying to
> make was, why come on with a self-righteous argument about including
> academic index in the PWR -- while dissing supposed "JOCK U." ---- which
> schools exactly are JOCK U?? What is the point? --- I assume he doesn't
> think Michigan is one of those.
>
 
This (academics vs. athletics) is a big dilemma in virtually all colleges and universities right now. Bob's suggestion, while probably impracticle and certainly not something the NC$$ will consider any time soon, is interesting, and well worth discussing. Let's not degenerate the discussion by sniping at each other's individual schools.
 
-Geo
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.