HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Jan 1998 12:35:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
At 2:03 AM -0700 1/3/1998, John T. Whelan wrote:
> Mike Machnik writes about the Ice Breaker tournament:
>
> >After the tourney, USCHO contacted the NCAA and was told that the games
> >would not count in NCAA selection or in the NCAA's overall stats.
>
>       This comes as a surprise, since the last word from the NCAA
> that appeared on the list was the following, right after the
> tournament.  I think this was a second- or third-hand account, by way
> of the Milwaukee Journal.
>
> " Prior to Friday's games Parker said that the four coaches (Parker, Sauer,
> " Mason and Morris) met and agreed to recommend that the games be treated as
> " exhibition games. The issue is going before the championships committee of
> " the NCAA for a ruling. The ruling is not expected for a couple of months.
>
> So does this mean
>       1) The championships committee actually ruled back in October
>       2) The issue was settled without ever making it to committee
> or    3) The committee still hasn't ruled officially, but the powers
> that be know how they will rule.  (Sorry, I didn't mean to make that
> sound like a conspiracy theory.) ?
 
I don't know about any of this.  I recall hearing the Journal account, but
within a week after the tourney, USCHO received what was interpreted as a
definitive response from the NCAA.
 
> "  The press
> " kit outlining the background/status of the IceBreaker Tournament (that I
> " picked up in Milwaukee last April) in its original Chicago location
> " clearly states that these were to count as regular-season contests, and
> " were NOT exhibitions.
 
This is incorrect.  I just looked again at the documents in the kit, and
none of them say this.
 
---                                                                   ---
Mike Machnik                [log in to unmask]               *HMM* 11/13/93
*****         Color Voice of Merrimack Hockey  WCAP 980 AM          *****
*****       Unofficial Merrimack Hockey home page located at:       *****
*****   http://www.tiac.net/users/machnik/MChockey/MChockey.html    *****
>>>    U.S. College Hockey Online http://www.uscollegehockey.com/     <<<
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2