[log in to unmask] (Chuck Henderson) wrote:
 
>I don't doubt that the goal wasn't disallowed because no replay
>view actually showed Matt Garver throwing the puck into the net.
>Never mind that all views showed that there was no stick (except
>Garver's motionless one) within 15 feet of the puck, which was
>clearly under Garver.  Any intelligent use of replay would
>disallow the goal, because the replays confirmed that there was
>no legal way the puck could have crossed the goal line.  Maybe
>the replay official doesn't have the the authority to rule this
>way, but he should.
 
An intelligent use of replay would come up with the exact same
scenario.  It was not seen, therefore, the call was correct.  If it is
not evident, then it is the right call from the replay official.
 
Jayson
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.