Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 91 19:23:15 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dean Barker writes:
>While stating his argument in the HE vs. ECAC battle Sid Whitaker writes:
>
>> To say that UMD in 84-85 was not a championship-calibre team is
>> simply untrue. UMD certainly deserved to win, and it was only by
>> chance that they lost to RPI.
>
>UMD had one player on that team that was real dominant. What was that
>players name? Hmmm, I can't remember.........was it, uh....Hull......
>Naw, it couldn't have been.
Hull didn't have a bad season in 84-85 - 32-28--60 in 48 games, but
Bill Watson was the nation's leading scorer and won the Hobey with
49-60--109 in 46 games. Duluth had three other players who
actually scored more points than Hull. But in 1985-86, The Golden
Brett racked up 52-32--84 in 42 games, fifth in the nation.
- mike (statistics, we deliver)
|
|
|