Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:33:57 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If this was done in response to perceived travel peril from terrorists,
then the terrorists have won. This should never have been implemented.
I see no reason to keep this policy. I hope this is a one year deal that
gets ditched next year when (if) we expand to 16.
Just my 0.02 Euros.
Tony Buffa RPI '64 (who is fearlessly flying on March 25th)
======
"Joshua D. Gibney" wrote:
>
> I believe that the committee was quite clear that they were going to limit
> travel. Only the bye teams would be sent to another region regardless of
> proximity to the regionals (400 miles)...
> Had MSU won, a western team would have been sent out East, and one of the
> bottom two teams, I presume (?) would have been shipped west. I don't
> agree with how it was done this year, and think it's an EXTREMELY
> unballanced set of regionals.. I'd love to see better games (The western
> regionals are going to be sweet) than Cornell/QU and Maine/Harvard (no
> offense to those teams) on the first day of the regionals...
> BUT it was made clear the way it would be done, after 9/11.. I don't thik
> people actually believed it until they saw it drawn out.. last night
|
|
|