HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dr. Bob Hamilton" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:51:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Is it not true that using recent game performances, other than the single
game performance of a tournament winner, is also using game performances?.
Doesn't it all come down to weight's given to game performances, whether it
is a weight given to recent, for playing against top opponents, etc.  The
original post was basically about using recent performance instead of
equally weighing all after "other adjustments" performances in games
throughout the year. Some extreme examples were so characterized and given
to emphasize the importance of using current information.  Bob Hamilton
-----Original Message-----
From: John T Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2007 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Starting the Bitching Early


>On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Dr. Bob Hamilton wrote:
>
>> Seems by the logic
>> presented, that it is nonsense.to give the NCAA bid to the tournament
champ
>> instead of the league champ.
>
>No, because the tournament champion is a consequence of game results,
>and not game-external information.
> John Whelan
> Cornell '91

ATOM RSS1 RSS2