Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:32:18 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That brings to mind a question. Since it isn't illegal for your own man
to be in the crease, what if on a power play you wedged three bodies
into the goal mouth in such a way that there isn't any room for a puck
to get through at all? Kind of dangerous for the foolhardy souls
willing to give up their bodies to a slap shot, but illegal? Viable?
Tom Rowe
-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Burton
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 2:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: new nets?
Someone commmented during the final five that the goalie equipment in
the pros was going to be scaled back a bit and be the same size as
college. If you look at the goalies in college hockey this season there
isn't a lot of room to score even on a smaller goalie like Jordan
Parise. The equipment is way too big. It can make a bad goalie good.
Eric Burton
[log in to unmask]
(701)-610-9466
The Tree of Liberty Must be Refreshed From Time to Time with the Blood
of Patriots and Tyrants.
-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Joe Makowiec
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: new nets?
At 4-4-2005 10:17 PM -0500, Eric Burton wrote:
>You have to be kidding me. I think that net looks like a God awful
>gimmick. I think if hockey wants to facilitate scoring make the goalie
>equipment smaller.
Notice the date on the article...
That said, something /could/ be done by way of cutting down on the size
of the appliances that goalies use in the here-and-now. I can
understand protection, but some of those goalies go better than 4 x 6
when they stretch out. It can make it tough to score. Or maybe a
larger net would be good?
Joe
--
Joe Makowiec can be reached at:
http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
http://makowiec.org/
|
|
|